|
Analysis and Perspective
|
|||||
Coalition struggles with the enemies from within11/03/2001
WASHINGTON – The Bush administration's coalition against terrorism includes
several nations so hostile toward each other that their quarrels threaten to
weaken the war against Osama bin Laden and the Taliban.
• More than
50 countries have granted landing and overflight rights for military
operations. • About 80
countries have taken steps to freeze terrorist assets. • More than
40 countries have arrested suspected terrorists and their supporters.
• More than
100 countries have offered increased information sharing and intelligence
support. In addition,
several countries have made specific pledges of military support. Britain
is fully cooperating in the military effort, and its forces took part in
the first attacks against targets in Afghanistan. Several other European
countries have pledged military support as the operation has unfolded.
• Australia
and Canada also have pledged military support. Turkey, which is home to a
U.S. air base, has agreed to send special forces to the region.
• In South
and Central Asia, Pakistan has allowed the use of its bases, Tajikistan
has allowed the deployment of U.S. troops, and Uzbekistan is allowing the
use of its bases. • In the
Middle East, Saudi Arabia has allowed operations from its Prince Sultan
Air Base, and Egypt is allowing the use of its bases. • Japan,
whose constitution prohibits it from engaging in war, has offered
logistical support and has deployed a destroyer to the Indian Ocean.
The problems are myriad and not easily solved. Israeli Prime Minister Ariel
Sharon has complained bitterly about U.S. diplomatic overtures toward Iran and
Syria. Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee has told President Bush there
are limits to India's patience with Pakistani-sponsored terrorism in Kashmir.
Pakistani officials from President Pervez Musharraf on down complain U.S.
bombing in Afghanistan appalls Muslims worldwide and has alienated even
anti-Taliban Afghans. Meanwhile, the Afghan resistance fighters in the north –
no friends of Pakistan – beg for more bombings. Saudi Arabia insists it has no evidence that any Saudis were included among
the 19 suicide hijackers who attacked the Pentagon and New York's World Trade
Center – though the State Department says 15 of them applied there for visas to
the United States. State Department spokesmen insist cooperation with Saudi Arabia has been
excellent, but reports citing anonymous angry U.S. officials describe a royal
family that is soft on terrorism and that has a precarious grip on power. The Saudis blame Israel for the negative reports. All of these countries are part of the coalition with the United States to
defeat global terrorism. But holding them together has proved almost as tricky
as building an alternative to the Taliban among Afghanistan's rival tribes and
warlords. "This is the most difficult diplomatic chore I think we've had in my lifetime
and most difficult war we've had to fight in my lifetime," said Thomas
Gouttierre, the 61-year-old dean of international studies at the University of
Nebraska at Omaha. Diplomats and analysts say the greatest challenge is keeping the war on
terrorism from degenerating into the war Osama bin Laden wants to fight – a
renewed clash of civilizations between crusaders and Islam, where Christians and
Jews fight Muslims for dominance in the Middle East. Mr. bin Laden's decrees and videotapes instruct Muslims that they have a
religious duty to join such a war. And although his instructions carry no
authority within Islam, the images and stories seen nightly across the Middle
East and South Asia suggest that Muslims are under attack. Al-Jazeera, the popular Arabic-language satellite television station based in
Qatar, is filled with nightly images of Afghan civilians killed or wounded by
U.S. bombings. The same newscasts also often show Palestinians hurt or killed by
the Israeli army in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. "They're concentrating on civilians and cluster bombs, things like that, and
that gains a lot of public sympathy," said Jaafar Allagany, spokesman for the
Saudi Embassy in Washington. "People don't believe it's about getting rid of
terrorism when they see that the faces of little girls are gone from a bombing."
The initial rush to the streets in Pakistan, Egypt, and Indonesia to protest
the U.S. bombing of Afghanistan has quieted, but diplomats from the region say a
sullen, deeper anti-Americanism has taken root. Tom Farar, dean of international studies at the University of Denver, said
the United States must have Muslim allies in the war in Afghanistan to maintain
a focus on countering terrorism rather than on Islam. But it's not easy to keep
aboard the Saudis, Egypt, Kuwait, or Pakistan when all these governments have
tenuous claims to power. "Their legitimacy is thin, they are reluctant to openly associate with us,
and they fear a tidal wave beginning to develop that could sweep them away," he
said. In an Oct. 22 National Press Club speech, Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon
Peres described the challenges his government faces. "The United States feels that in order to organize the proper coalition, they
need tranquillity in the Middle East as much as we can, to reduce the flames.
And we understand it," he said. "The problem is how to do it." Administration officials insist that the effort to keep everyone in line will
not compromise U.S. goals. Seen another way, they say, bringing such hostile
countries under the same umbrella could present opportunities. Already the coalition has enabled cooperation that six months ago would have
been unthinkable. Russia, China and the United States, for instance, are jointly
coordinating diplomatic efforts with countries in Central Asia and are sharing
intelligence on terrorism threats. Secretary of State Colin Powell says outrage over what happened on Sept. 11
has been so universal, all but three or four countries around the world have
joined the coalition. Unlike the 1991 Persian Gulf War, few of the countries included are taking
part in military operations. No Muslim nations have combat aircraft joining the
air campaign. The special forces units that may ultimately be committed on the
ground come from the United States, Canada, Europe and Australia, although
Turkey, a Muslim country, has volunteered to send about 90 of its own special
forces soldiers. Hostilities between Pakistan and the Afghan resistance fighters grouped
together as the Northern Alliance are complicating military operations. So far,
the 15,000 to 20,000 Northern Alliance soldiers are the most viable fighting
force inside Afghanistan resisting the Taliban. They accuse Pakistan of
thwarting greater cooperation with U.S. forces. Gen. Musharraf and other Pakistani officials have warned the United States
against joint operations with the Northern Alliance, which is supported by
Russia and India and is composed mainly of Tajiks and Uzbeks from northern
Afghanistan. The Pakistanis want Washington to work with anti-Taliban Pashtun warlords.
But those forces have yet to materialize, despite a recruitment campaign by the
CIA and Pakistan's military intelligence service, the ISI. Pakistani officials say the bombing campaign should halt while the
intelligence services try again to produce a Pashtun force that could attract
Taliban defectors. Haron Amin, the Washington spokesman for the Northern Alliance, blamed
Pakistan for blocking military coordination with the U.S. military that might
have produced battlefield gains in the cities of Mazar-e Sharif and Herat. Mr. Powell said diplomatic interests are not restraining the military. "There are no arrangements within this coalition which in any way, shape,
fashion or form constrain the president and the exercise of his constitutional
responsibilities to defend the United States of America and to defend the people
of the United States. So that should not be a concern in anyone's mind," he told
the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Squabbling members of the coalition have for the most part chosen to fight
through damaging media reports about each other. The Times of India reported Oct. 12 that the former head of
Pakistan's military intelligence service this summer arranged the transfer of
$100,000 to Mohamed Atta, the Egyptian who authorities say flew the first
hijacked airliner into the World Trade Center. Zamir Akram, deputy chief of mission of the Pakistani Embassy in Washington,
said the report was "absolute nonsense." "This is part of a clear-cut effort by India to spread disinformation about
Pakistan that could cause discomfort and confusion with the United States," he
said. Arabic-language papers recycle an unsubstantiated report that thousands of
Jewish workers stayed home rather than go to work at the World Trade Center in
New York on the day the towers were destroyed – evidence, these papers say, that
Israel was behind the attacks. Egypt's leading newspapers meanwhile say criticisms of Egypt and other Arab
countries in the U.S. media come from "Zionists" and the "Jewish lobby." U.S. reporting on Saudi Arabia has blamed the Saudi royal family for
supporting Mr. bin Laden, enabling pro-Syrian terrorists to bomb U.S.
installations inside the kingdom and arranging a meeting between Mr. bin Laden
and the head of Iraq's intelligence service. Mr. Allagany, the Saudi spokesman, denied the reports. Like the Egyptian
papers, he blamed Israel. "This is orchestrated from Israel, to all the Zionist media here, and they
are carrying it out faithfully," Mr. Allagany said. Israeli Embassy spokesman Mark Regev said it made no sense to accuse Israel
of feeding such stories. "There's no information campaign against Saudi Arabia. The Saudis have a
problem in the United States, because like some other countries they have been
supporting extremists, supporting terrorism," he said. "Everyone in Israel understands that this war against terrorism will not be
won by alienating everyone in the Islamic world," he said. "Everyone in Israel
is praying for the stability of the government of Pakistan, which is no friend
of Israel, because the alternative to that government is so much worse. We know
the fight can only be won if moderates in the Arab world are part of the
coalition." |
|||||